Tuesday, May 23, 2017

The problem with the NBA



It has to be said: this is the most predictable/least competitive NBA playoffs ever.

The Cavs-Warriors trilogy was preordained the moment KD joined Golden State in July 2016. The bookies knew it. The league knew it. Objective fans knew it. The only people who would say otherwise are (1) the media—it’s their job to keep the season interesting; and (2) legacy-conscious fans of LeBron or the Dubs—they wouldn’t be historically great if they keep playing the Washington Generals, eh? Between them, the two teams have 7 of the 30 best players in the NBA today,[1] each of whom made the All-Star team this year. No other team has more than two. If you’re keeping count, the Warriors have 4 of the 7, so naturally, LeBron wanted another all-star. Unfortunately, he had to settle for former all-stars Kyle Korver and Deron Williams. Needless to say, the King wasn’t pleased.

It’s not yet the last week of May[2] and we’re almost there. We are getting the rubber match… that we knew we’d get for almost a year. Yay…??? For non-LeBronites and non-GSW-bandwagoners, sorry, but you just wasted your time watching 82 games and three playoff rounds. This is the product the NBA is selling, and it’s more predictable than WWE’s storyline. The predictability stemming from the lack of competitiveness is highlighted by the teams’ playoff records: Golden State is 12-0, Cleveland is 10-1. To be fair, Cleveland made it interesting during the regular season by finishing second to Boston in the East. But nobody seriously believed that the Celtics are the better team. Actually, I don’t know what to make of the Cavs, with their three all-stars, in a weaker conference, not even coming close to 65 wins. If MJ played with two other all-stars… I’m sorry, I digress.

Special shout-out to the Spurs, the second-best team in the league which had the unenviable luck of playing in the same conference as the video-game-cheat-code Warriors. They looked like they had a puncher’s chance of making the the Dubs sweat… until Kawhi’s ankle got Zaza’d. But would have they won the series at full strength? I think not, and Vegas agrees.

Boston fans hope that LeBron gets Olynyk’d, except that LeBron doesn’t get injured, he just gets cramps. Marcus Smart will not hit seven threes again, Avery Bradley will not get the same lucky bounce, and I haven’t even mentioned that the Celtics are already without their best player for whatever remains of this short series. Besides, they already won the draft lottery, so imagine how much more insufferable Celtics fans can get if they actually pull off the upset.[3]

Predictability and lack of competitiveness make sports dull and uninteresting. And I don’t mean it from an aesthetic point-of-view. The Warriors can be fun to watch, but basketball isn’t performance art. It’s not theater, it’s a sport. Where’s the thrill in regularly watching a 20-point beatdown in the playoffs?[4] The essence of sport is competition. You take away the competitive aspect and you’re watching something entirely different: professional entertainment. I outgrew wrestling 15 years ago, and the NBA is sadly headed in that direction.

The worst part is that the league might not be able to do anything about it. How do you change the mindset of the current generation of players who value winning easy rather than winning on equal terms? When the media normalizes such behavior, what can you do? KD has an idea: “If you don't like it, don't watch it.” He’s right, of course. That’s exactly what I’ve done all season. I haven’t watched a full game since the Warriors-Spurs on opening night—almost exactly 7 months ago.

Thank God for the Stanley Cup playoffs. Go Pens!


[1] 2016 ESPN #NBArank: 1. LeBron 2. Curry 3. KD 14. Draymond 15. Kyrie 16. Klay 28. Love

[2] I don’t remember the Finals being set before the last week of May ever.

[3] I actually don’t mind. But it's​not gonna happen.


[4] Those who enjoy these games might genuinely be sadists.

Tuesday, January 31, 2017

LeBron's obsession: The public's perception of his legacy

LeBron recently went after Charles Barkley a week after Chuck (and Kenny) called out LeBron for being whiny. Mainstream sports media has come to LeBron's defense, with the most ridiculous being this piece from The Ringer. (I really should unfollow that site. Bill Simmons has lost his edge. Everybody there is a conformist.)

LeBron made it personal. But he was unresponsive to the criticism. He cited facts about Chuck, but they're irrelevant to what Chuck said. Ad hominem. Chuck wasn't talking about LeBron not being a good role model. He said that LeBron doesn't want to compete. It should be obvious that LeBron's response is all about trying to control the public perception of his legacy (he's like the Donald and his alternative facts that way). "I'm not going to let him disrespect my legacy like that." Let's get this legacy thing right by doing some quick fact checks:

In 2010, LeBron started the whole superteam trend by joining Wade and Bosh--despite the Cavs being the #1 seed in the East the 2 previous years. And let's dispel the notion that Wade was no longer in his prime in 2010. Wade was 1st Team All-NBA in 2010, finished in the top 5 of the MVP voting, and was just a season removed from putting up 30-7.5-5.

After the Heat was blown away by the Spurs in 2014, LeBron left bad-knees-Wade and zombie Bosh for a pair of younger all-stars in Irving and Love. Everybody bought the homecoming narrative, but the simple truth is that LeBron knew it would be difficult to win another title in Miami after the Spurs humiliated them in 2014 (the Spurs beat the Heat by 14 points per game; in the four Spurs wins, they outscored Miami by 72 points). And make no mistake, the Love deal was already in place before he signed--that's why he never mentioned Andrew Wiggins in his essay.

Now, just weeks after the Cavs acquired Korver, LeBron's complaining to the media about needing more pieces. Despite being the defending champions whose core remained intact. Despite still having two all-star teammates. Despite being 4 games clear in the loss column in the East. Why? Is he so afraid of the Warriors? The Spurs retooled on the fly and, despite having just one all-star, are the second best team in the league. So it's certainly not just about getting all the superstars. Except that, to LeBron, it is.

The only reasonable conclusion is that LeBron wants the easiest way to winning his rings. He's the guy who plays a video game at the easiest setting just so he can boast that he beat the game. Don't get me wrong, LeBron's a very good basketball player. What he did in last year's finals was truly amazing. And I'm sure he wants to win. I guess there is a minimum level of competitive spirit required in order to have that desire. But what Chuck is talking about is taking it upon yourself to overcome the challenges with the team that you have; see how far your skills can take you. No ifs and buts. That's what LeBron lacks. And we've seen enough of his career to know that to be true. So when we talk about legacy, just remember that LeBron always took the easiest route.